Breaking

यमन ने सऊदी अरब के सामने रखी अजीब शर्त, यमनियों की जाल में फंसा रियाज़...

Friday, 13 March 2026

Pretext for Attacking Iran, Crying Over Self-Inflicted Losses: In the US-Israel 'Operation Epic Fury', Iran Played No Role – All Was 'Accident' and 'Friendly Fight'!

Pretext for Attacking Iran, Crying Over Self-Inflicted Losses: In the US-Israel 'Operation Epic Fury', Iran Played No Role – All Was 'Accident' and 'Friendly Fight'!
-Friday World March 14,2026
On February 28, 2026, the United States and Israel launched coordinated large-scale airstrikes against Iran under 'Operation Epic Fury' (US) and 'Operation Roaring Lion' (Israel). The operations began with the targeted assassination of Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, along with numerous senior officials, framed as eliminating a "nuclear threat" and pursuing regime change. 

→ However, the core claim of an imminent Iranian attack or provocation lacks substantiation in the provided narrative. No prior aggressive actions by Iran—such as missile launches, drone strikes, or direct assaults on US/Israeli assets—are documented as the trigger. Negotiations over Iran's nuclear program were reportedly ongoing, yet strikes commenced abruptly. 

→ All reported damage and losses to US and Israeli forces appear self-inflicted through operational errors, technical failures, and friendly fire incidents, rather than direct Iranian military successes. Iran consistently denied responsibility for many such events, and official US/Israeli statements often attributed them to accidents or misidentifications.

 → US Aircraft Losses – All 'By Accident'

→ 3 F-15E Strike Eagle fighter jets were lost on March 1, 2026, in Kuwait due to friendly fire from Kuwaiti air defenses mistakenly identifying them as hostile. All 6 pilots ejected safely, but the jets (valued at ~$94 million each) were destroyed, totaling ~$282 million in losses. No Iranian involvement confirmed. 

→ A KC-135 Stratotanker refueling aircraft crashed in western Iraq on March 12, 2026, due to mid-air collision or mechanical failure (CENTCOM stated no enemy or friendly fire). Crew fatalities reported in some accounts (3-6 personnel affected), marking additional aviation setbacks. 

→ Total US aviation losses: At least 3 fighter jets + 1 tanker, all linked to operational mishaps amid the intense campaign.

 → Israeli Losses – Drones and Civilians

 → Several unmanned drones destroyed (e.g., Hermes 900, IAI Eitan, Heron models), attributed internally to technical failures or operational errors rather than Iranian intercepts. Israel often denied Iranian claims of downing them.

 → Civilian casualties in Israel: 15-17 killed, thousands injured from falling debris or related incidents. No conclusive evidence ties these directly to Iranian missiles in all cases; some linked to defense system malfunctions. 

→ Human and Economic Toll – Self-Inflicted Narrative

 → US casualties: 9-15 service members killed (some from initial retaliatory waves, others non-combat or accidents), 170+ wounded. Economic damage: Billions in the first weeks (e.g., $1.9-3.7 billion early estimates), including radar systems at Al Udeid (Qatar), THAAD in UAE (~$500 million), and SATCOM terminals. 

→ Israeli casualties: 2 soldiers killed, 14 wounded; civilian deaths 15-17. Weekly economic hit: ~$2.93 billion from disruptions. 

→ These losses occurred despite air superiority claims, often during chaotic multi-nation operations involving allies' defenses. 

→ Broader Context: Iran as the Innocent Party?

→ The campaign involved strikes on 2000+ targets, severely degrading Iran's navy, missiles, drones, and leadership. Yet Iran maintained a defensive posture, with retaliatory missile/drone waves targeting regional US/Israeli assets and closing the Strait of Hormuz. 

→ No evidence supports that Iran initiated aggression; the strikes appear pre-emptive under the pretext of nuclear elimination and regime change. Over 1,200-1,444 Iranian deaths (mostly civilians per some reports) resulted from the attacks.

 → Pentagon statements indicate prolonged operations, but critics argue the "nuclear threat" rationale masked broader geopolitical aims. Self-inflicted errors highlight risks of aggressive, unilateral campaigns. 

→ Conclusion

 → This conflict exemplifies how pretexts can lead to one-sided escalation, where the aggressors suffer from their own operational chaos while blaming the target. Iran stood defensively as US-Israel forces inflicted—and absorbed—significant self-damage through "friendly fire" and accidents. As the operation continues, the hollowness of the initial justifications becomes increasingly evident, reminding the world that aggression often rebounds on its initiators. Truth will emerge further with time.

Sajjadali Nayani ✍ 
Friday World March 14,2026